Why buying a house is a bad investment




















Instead, if you took what you'd save from not buying a house and invested it in something that's likely to grow in value, such as stocks and bonds, chances are you'd end up with more money in the long term. Both Sethi and Mallouk emphasize the importance of crunching the numbers before buying a home: Take stock of your own financial standing and then look into the average cost of buying versus renting a home in your area.

Try to project whether or not buying makes sense for you, and ask yourself whether you're better off renting and putting the money that you'd save into investments such as mutual funds.

Of course. Maybe you want to buy because you want to knock that wall down. Maybe you want to buy because you want your kids to go to a certain school. First, you have to pay your real estate broker. Also, don't forget about land transfer taxes, which are paid to the city and can vary from almost nothing 0. The national average is about 1. If all these numbers are making your head spin, you aren't alone. Here's a summary of all these costs we've talked about:.

Fifty-one percent of it got eaten up! Maybe you're thinking, That's not so bad; that's still six figures of gain. Here's the thing. In this analysis, I've assumed that this family bought the house outright with a suitcase full of cash. As we know, almost no one does that; they borrow the money in the form of a mortgage. So, let's add that in. That's money they're never getting back.

If the house appreciates any slower, then they're actually losing money. This is why the typical family who keeps the majority of their net worth in their property never accumulates much money. They think they're getting ahead as they see its value go up, but they don't realize that all the extra costs add up to the point where most of their gain has vanished. Read more : The suburban mansion may be losing its spot as part of the American Dream, and it highlights just how different millennials' and baby boomers' worlds are.

A house can be a great investment—for real estate brokers, the government, insurance companies, and banks. Houses are expensive, upkeep is expensive, heating is expensive, everything just keeps taking money from your pockets when you own a home. Although your house is an Asset, it is also a Liability because you owe money on it.

When you invest your money you want to be able to make more money with your investment. One of the biggest investments you will make is in a house and it will cost you money, not, make you money. Over the long run, the cost of houses has steadily increased but not because the house is worth more. No, the house is worth the same amount today as it was when it was built 30 years ago.

The reason you get more money for houses over time is that house prices follow with inflation. Inflation is your money, losing buying power over time.

You need somewhere to live, so although having a house can be a bad investment, it is a necessary obstacle to contend with in life. Find a way to afford a house and not become house poor, which is when you are paycheck to paycheck and if you get hit with an unexpected bill it could hurt you. Create your own reality and live an extraordinary life, just make good investment choices! I had to laugh at the moving every eight years. Because I bought a house that cost only one years entry level wages and gradually added on and improved it over time we never had high payments and easily paid it off early.

We raised three kids from birth to successful adulthood in this house. There was never any risk because, as you recommended, we did not buy outside of what we could easily afford. There is something awesome, and hard to explain about living for decades in one house. It is kind of sad that so few people get to experience it. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.

These cookies do not store any personal information. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. If I were renting my Washington, DC, house instead of owning it, I'd be paying roughly 5 percent of its value in rent each year.

So in effect, owning a house provides me with a housing "dividend" of around 5 percent of the home's value minus maintenance costs, taxes, insurance, and other expenses, which in my case adds up to around 1 percent of the home's value. That compares favorably with the stock market, where companies pay annual dividends worth only about 2. Of course, it's true that stocks do appreciate in value more quickly than houses, so the overall rate of return on stocks is probably higher than the rate of return on housing.

On the other hand, house prices are a lot less volatile than stock prices. An inflation-adjusted rate of return of around 4 percent — with very low risk — makes housing a pretty attractive investment option.

Finally, the tax code provides huge advantages to homeownership. The interest you pay on a home mortgage is tax-deductible. And whereas you have to pay taxes on stock dividends and bond interest payments, there's no taxes due on the free housing you get as a homeowner. The value of these tax advantages depends in part on your income, but generally speaking, the wealthier you are, the better deal it is to buy a house.

The second big argument against owning a house has to do with diversification, a fundamental principle of good investment. That's because the value of any single stock fluctuates more than the market as a whole, so buying a broader portfolio allows you to get the same high returns at lower risk.

Buying a huge, illiquid asset like a house seems to fly in the face of this principle. If you have the bad luck to buy a house in a declining neighborhood — or at the peak of a housing bubble, like in — you could wind up having your home equity totally wiped out. So, the argument goes, it might be better to keep renting and put the down payment in a broad stock market portfolio. But this ignores a crucial fact about human beings: If we don't own a house, then we have to pay rent every month.

And rent is itself highly volatile. As renters living in a high-cost area will tell you, one of the biggest fears is that rents will rise faster than their incomes, pricing them out of a neighborhood they love.

In Wall Street lingo, everyone is born with a short position on housing. From this perspective, a house isn't a risky bet on the housing market. Rather, it's an insurance policy against the volatility that everyone faces if they don't buy a house.

Of course, there's some truth to Tabarrok's argument that buying a house makes it harder to move to a new city if a regional downturn hammers the local housing market and the job market simultaneously.

But the significance of this factor depends a lot on your situation.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000